« Most read Realitybase posts in August | Main | Wages for college graduates in the cross hairs of US business »

If the Ryan plan had been in effect in 2010, Romney’s tax rate would have been 0.82% instead of 13.9%. 

Paul Ryan's budget plan, which Mitt Romney has endorsed and now fully embraced by putting Ryan on the ticket, would eliminate all taxes on capital gains, dividends, and interest and lower the top marginal rate on earned income from 35% to 25%. Romney's 2010 income included over $21 million from capital, and he would pay no taxes on that. He had $0.6 million income from author and speaking fees that would have been taxed, but at a rate lower than his actual 2010 rate. Altogether his effective federal tax rate would have been 0.82%. Matthew O'Brien has the story at The Atlantic. Hat tip Mark Thoma. Can Romney/Ryan possibly win the November election without publicly disowning this tax proposal?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>