« Even in Wyoming, they think Cheney’s a dick. | Main | No WMD in Iraq: Bush blunder or cover-up? »

Two hypotheses for why US CEO pay is so high

Average CEO compensation in the US is more than twice the average of other advanced countries and is 56% higher than second place Switzerland.

Also, the ratio of CEO compensation to the compensation of manufacturing production workers, at 39:1, is almost twice the average of the other advanced countries.

The usual defense of high US CEO pay is that it is set by market forces. If that's true, doesn't that mean the US has a relative shortage of CEO talent compared to the other advanced countries? (A short supply of qualified candidates has driven up prices more in the US than in other countries.)  On the other hand, if US CEO talent is relatively as abundant as in other countries, doesn't that mean the US CEO pay market has failed and should be fixed to eliminate inefficiencies?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>