State of the Union, Part 3—Obama’s grossly inadequate economic proposals
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 11:24AM
Skeptic in Economics, Favorites, Politics

In Part 1, I pointed to the disconnect between the President's vivid and dystopian description or our economic problems and his timid proposals to fix them. In Part 2, I quoted from his State of the Union address and then posted some charts and graphs to show that he does not overstate our problems, which are deep and structural as well as cyclical. However, there is nothing extraordinary, either in type or scale, about the proposed action plan in the State of the Union address. Every one of his proposals is one that has been proposed and/or adopted in response to prior "ordinary" recessions or just as preferred polices in the absence of a recession.

Furthermore, some of Obama's proposals are inconsistent with each other. For example, he wants to spend federal money to promote basic research, infrastructure construction, and education, and increase tax credits and deductions for various things while freezing for three years discretionary federal spending. Some of his proposals are mere goals that seem unattainable, for example the goal of doubling exports in five years, which trade experts say would require doing things that we have been unable to accomplish for decades—things like getting China to float its currency exchange rate.

Here's the President's full list. I challenge readers to explain how any part of this program—or the whole program—can be an adequate response to the problems he described and which do actually exist. To me it seems the President is just unwilling to make a break with past economic policies. He wants us to keep doing the same things that led to our problems and hope the outcomes will be different on his watch.

Update on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 11:20AM by Registered CommenterSkeptic

In this WaPo op ed two McKinsey Global Institute leaders debunk some of the myths underlying the new economic recovery program announced in Obama's State of the Union address. Neither the small business sector, the high tech sector (green jobs for example), nor increases in exports can have a big impact on our gaping unemployment problem. They foresee a fundamental restructuring of economic activity continuing to destroy existing jobs.

History shows that recessions – particularly those following a financial crisis – accelerate the growth or decline already underway in industries. In this recession, for example, the auto, financial services and residential real estate industries have contracted significantly and won't regain their peak employment anytime soon.

An increase in exports may stem – but will not reverse – the multidecade decline in manufacturing employment. In today's developed economies, net growth in new jobs doesn't come from manufacturing; it comes from service industries. Fortunately, boosting exports creates jobs in supporting service industries, such as design, trucking, shipping and logistics.


Article originally appeared on realitybase (http://www.realitybase.org/).
See website for complete article licensing information.